This is the second time i’ve tried to edit this!
i erred. this story first appeared in the guardian on oct 12, not today. i mistakenly assumed it appeared today as i have not seen this covered in the u.s. media. so the comey and this story are not in the same timeframe. however there are still questions that deserve an answer regarding both stories!
why did every republican hitman and woman have prepared statements ready? WHY did donald trump go into his rally 20 minutes early? WHY was the letter from comey announced while Clinton was in the air and out of reach of the media? well, we may know now... the Guardian has a fascinating story out, a federal judge in ny set the first court date against donald trump and jeffrey epstein in the alleged rape of a 13 year old girl:
A federal judge in New York has ordered counsel for Donald Trump and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein to appear in court along with the attorney for a woman referred to only as “Jane Doe” who alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her when she was 13.
Judge Ronnie Abrams has slated an initial status conference in the civil lawsuit for 16 December in a New York district court.
The order raises the extraordinary prospect, were Trump to win the 8 November battle for the White House, of counsel for a US president-elect being called into federal court in proceedings relating to allegations of rape of an underage girl.
has the media even mentioned this? has a single reporter covered this case at all? nope.
while this story has garnered NO attention in the u.s. nonstop media circus, comey’s letter to 18 members of congress that says nothing other than we are looking at a few more emails that may not have any relevance to anything but we are looking at them anyway and they are from a totally different source. the media has NOT addressed the much more serious implications of a presidential candidate being sued for the alleged rape of an underage child !
but… three emails vaguely referenced as not being relevant are all the media is covering! maybe the “weiner” aspect is more closely related to this story than we realize, even if the rape of a 13 yr old is considered not relevant to this election cycle.